A general election has been launched, which was brought about by the three-party agreement of the civilian public. The media are reporting the “differences in policy” of political parties like every day, but perhaps the people do not know what it is. There is also a wide range of fraudulent explanations. When it comes to the accumulation. There are misfortunes of the Japanese people.
Did the people forget that they made a big mistake by having an election to choose a policy?
Seven years ago, overwhelming majority of people chose “privatization of the postal service,” which was said by Prime Minister Koizumi to be “the first policy of the first reform.” I assumed that it was a policy to reform Japan.
US ended the “Soviet containment strategy” by the end of the Cold War.
It is no longer necessary to cooperate with the development of the Japanese economy, which was essential for the “Soviet containment strategy.” Rather, he came to think of a strategy to extort accumulated wealth from Japan. Which has been pursuing only economic growth by riding the US-Japan security for free.
What happened to the “privatisation of the postal service” that was chosen by the overwhelming majority of the people seven years ago?
It was reviewed under the Democratic government. After the change of government, the Democratic Party government abolished the “Annual Reform Request Form” and approved the “Postal Service Privatization Reform Act” in April of this year.
Only three LDP members opposed the “reform law” in their vote. Even the legislators who became “thugs” who rejected LDP members who opposed privatization in that election were in agreement. Almost all of the LDP members who enthusiastically appealed to the “privatization of the postal service” returned their palms. The outcome of the elected elections is so empty.
It is not easy to identify the authenticity even arranging policies. There are many cases where a policy that can explain anything in the mouth is deceived. It is more important to give an image of what kind of society we aim for as a result of individual policies. But if there are twelve political parties, it is difficult to distinguish it.
So what should we choose in the election?
Next to policy is to choose an individual. However, even in a short-term election of 12 days, it is difficult to distinguish it. In particular, there is no way to know the qualities of new members. In the end, the current parliamentarians are overwhelmingly advantageous. For a long term like the US presidential election, it is possible to judge the ability to execute and humanity from the viewpoint of enduring various attacks. However, as in Japan, even if the names are called consecutively, the individual qualities are unknown.
Then what should we do. First of all, it is necessary to erase the media reports from your mind and return to the basics of elections. As for the basics, first consider why the election was held. Second, the criteria for elections should be whether life has become easier or harder. If it becomes easier, continue the current politics.
If you feel distressed, cast a vote to change the current situation.
Even if the government does not change with one vote, if the number of opposition votes increases, the government will reconsider policies.
I think it is normal to vote with the second idea in a democratic country that repeats the change of government. The administration will not change. However, if more than half are dissatisfied, the administration will change. This is the basis of democratic elections. However, in Japan, which did not know about the change of government, the old election was a service battle without policy, and the reaction then put emphasis on only “policy”, and “blinding” elections that cheat the people It came to rampage.
Therefore, it is the first of the basics.
The reason for the election is clear. This is because the three parties, democratic, Liberal, and Komei, agreed to the consumption tax hike and passed the bill. Although he sang a reform with social security, he left the content of social security unclear and decided to increase the tax and questioned the people. I think the people have been licked a lot, but if you are still in favor of the consumption tax, you should vote for one of the three LDP parties. If not, vote for other parties. This is the core of this election.
However, the 3 Liberal-Democratic Party is arranging other policies to prevent the public from paying attention to the consumption tax and pretending that they are not one. This is a typical “blind” approach. The 3 Liberal Democratic Party believes that it can easily trick by changing the eyes of the stupid people. However, even if they scream and make a difference. The three parties can only engage in politics after joining the elections.
The important thing in voting is the post-election regime.
It is the power of numbers that implements the policy, which determines the actual politics. It is confirm that the three parties of the Liberal Democratic Party will work together to increase consumption tax. On the other hand, in other projects.
Therefore, it is not correct to call the Japan Restoration Society the “third pole.” Powers that do not fight with the civilian public should call “complementary powers” rather than “third poles.”
If you decide the current situation or not, choose the political party that suits your feeling from each group. I will look at the policies arranged at that time. Isn’t this the basis of the election? If we focus on many policies and emphasize only the differences like this election. The framework of the post-election regime and the core part of the consumption tax hike will disappear.